|
2009-07-27 05:42, lipslidemyrail wrote:
Lol I registered on this website JUST to post on this thread!
Honestly, I have to agree a little bit with what supercreck had said earlier about how the SC scene wouldn't be the same without Kespa. Although this development with KESPA over the exhibition match between MOON and NADA is unfortunate, we can all understand where this is coming from. Blizzard may have made the game initially, and hold the rights the their own game. but KESPA and the E-sports community in Korea MADE it a cash-cow and an international success. And the comment from Lord_of_chaos about his unselfish contributions to this website is retold with even more vigor when considering KESPA and south-korean associations have put in 9 years of work who put together the E-sports scene and never asked a penny from BLIZZARD.
Additionally, it's apparent that KESPA has been shaken to say the least. With the recent declaration by the tongue of BLizzard itself, SC2 will not offer LAN support. Everyone knows that this means the Korean E-sports scene, which runs primarily off of LAN based tournaments, will ultimately fade away, and have no leverage inside the SC2 platform. Now, you have to ask yourself the fairness in BLIZZARDS decision on this matter for a change. Clearly we see why KESPA can't go un-heard.
Take for example NADA, a HUGE success, a legend, THE GENIUS TERRAN. Did Blizzard Galvonize this internationally popular E-sports HERO into the Hall of Fame for SC? The story is the same for each Progamer, but the point being that BLIZZARD's involvment and their role ultimately inside the E-sports community and KESPA itself (who created the colossal Computergame industry when it went corporate in the late 90's) had been a "blind eye" to say the least.
And now Blizzard, who NEVER helped to construct or offer a hand in the success of KESPA or SC at large, and in fact left it for dead along with its WC3 counter-part when WOW hit the market, suddenly sees the opportunity to strip away many years of hard work by corporations and groups of individuals by not allowing LAN support. In my humble opinion, KESPA is simply reinstating their prominence over the FACT that MOON and NADA, who's success is largely due to KESPA and it's corporate muscle, still fall under rules and the jurisdiction of their association. And that if Blizzard wants to hold a surprise exhibition match, its gonna have to recognize KESPA and respect them. Blizzard can't simply act like a deserting father, who left behind his 1 y/o son to fend for himself, and then com back 9 years later seeing dollar signs and say "oh, I'll take this over now even though i've been absent all this time."
I agree with everything but what you said about Kespa not being able to maintain, they still could, just would have to hold the matches on b.net, and then record the wins/losses.
Thank you for having some sense when you said that, you said what I wanted to say in more articulate words. I still think that Blizzard has something up their sleeve, I doubt they wanna just take away KESPA's power over the gaming scene in korea, why would they do that when it drives sales in their country? It's free marketing for Blizzard, and I doubt they will just throw that away, if they do, it's not the same blizzard that used to exist, and I fear for sc2's future. |