Advertisement
 

Membership

 

Advertisement

 

Advertisement

 
Forums \ DotA strategic forum \ What is metagame and who is cmw ??
 1, 2

4 months ago
#21
Small stars represents one level - This user is on level 2Small stars represents one level - This user is on level 2
Dendendenden
I would love to play with Arcadia.WarGS.
Isn't that arrogant?

4 months ago
#22
Big stars represents five levels - This user is on level 5
dZ.d1PZ-_-
pinoy troll, nothin unusual
How can my feet smell when they don't have a nose

4 months ago
#23
Small stars represents one level - This user is on level 2Small stars represents one level - This user is on level 2
rhai03
#15 as I said dude, they know the current metagame BUT (take note of the but dude) they pic weird heroes for their own strategies, that's why they have a thing called PRACTICE, they practice those heroes again and again. If choosing weird heroes is your basis in calling a strategy based metagame, then DK don't either know the current metagame because they picked KARDEL on their recent game at WGT??? It's impossible to a professional teams, to be delayed on knowing the current metagame (even us know about it), they just have their own strategies to put the opponent out of their game, bec. of weird picks and weird strategies.. Like artstyle huh??? (Viper, techies, pudge, ezalor, etc.)

4 months ago
#24
This user is a member of the GosuCrew
Big stars represents five levels - This user is on level 18 Big stars represents five levels - This user is on level 18 Big stars represents five levels - This user is on level 18
Small stars represents one level - This user is on level 18Small stars represents one level - This user is on level 18Small stars represents one level - This user is on level 18
ngazi (GosuBet Manager DotA)
2012-01-14 00:10, Arcadia.WarGS wrote:
I am aware that he is trolling, but my point is most pinoys are like him, not really trolls but people who are isolated from the rest of the world. @ ctchocula the time gap between the international and SMM is about 5 months? So meaning scythe still thought sf was viable since the metagame was only shifting, plus dota2 has a different metagame with the limited hero pool. Saying that mineski has not realized this after 5 months is ridiculous, Sf got no buffs just until recently. And this is loser's bracket finals were talking about, so is this a go big or go home situation? If they had played smarter, maybe they would have had a chance with nirvana.cn. Rolling the dice is just too much of a risk. And @18, I did say they were good right? They are professionals and talented, so where did you get the idea that I was better than mineski? I could argue that I am more aware of the metagame and more enlightened as well, but Playing better is a different story
Son trolling is great and all but don't stereotype your fellow forumers or a pro team.
This post was edited by its author @ 4 months ago

4 months ago
#25
Small stars represents one level - This user is on level 2Small stars represents one level - This user is on level 2
MYCURRENTFLOWS
@15 do you know why DK picked sniper? It is because of synergy, proper laning and teamplay with the slardar to stun first then others to follow while sniper free shots everyone else. Sure, maybe mineski did practice the hero, but did the lord of avernus trilane and sf solo mid work? That was poor laning in my opinion, you simply cannot solo sf with dual ck aa mid against you, again SUBOPTIMAL gameplay. Trilane abbadon as carry, sure he prevented stuns and tanked, but they did not catch up with experience, and abbadon is semi-level dependent if you ask me. I may or may not be wrong about their knowledge of the metagame, but if you think that surprise picks that are proven ineffective( or atleast sensibly ineffective against other team's line-up) is the ideal strategy, then you better check again. Don't make an argument that artstyle also used weird heroes, it is because they were thought-out and surprise picks that caught teams off-guard and was effective in the long-run. Would anyone be surprised by a shadow fiend pick when it has been proven that he has been ineffective in recent versions? Viper was laned properly if I remember correctly and was very effective and the pudge was a matter of skill as dendi and artstyle are god pudge players, able to isolate heroes in a teamfight. As I said, suboptimal strategies hinder Mineski's full potential. Imagine if they had put one support to help julz in the mid lane instead of staying in the trilane, then he wouldn't have been pwned by the ck aa combo as hard as he did. Eventually that trilane is gonna break up, and your enemies will have much more experience than you, thus having more power in the mid-game, and Mineski's overall strategy was to dominate mid-game? Is that not counter-intuitive? Please understand, I am not trying to put down Mineski, they are great, entertaining and all, but all I am saying is that they need to get their shit straight, because I feel like so much is being wasted. I apologize for my hastened generalization, but that's how I see it.

and btw OP, we are complete opposites, I am sensible and you are a troll, so go troll somewhere else. This forum is for intellectual debates like these not your bullcrap.
This post was edited by its author @ 4 months ago

4 months ago
#26
This user is a member of the GosuCrew
Big stars represents five levels - This user is on level 5
TheGhostWriter (Junior Moderator)
Troll thread. Locked.

 1, 2

Forums
This thread has been locked due to its content by the Crew.